This is scifi level cyberattack capabilities, not hacking + downloading emails. STUXNET! https://t.co/R3ViwQ9Whj
— 28Sherman (@28ShermanSOBL1) December 12, 2016
Journalistic summary of the Zero Days (2016) investigation. The movie is excellent.
Some basic realism from John Gray:
In Europe, the impact of Trump’s election can only be to accelerate disintegration.
Kevin Rudd in The Guardian:
The slow, but steady decline of the UN, and the wider multilateral system which has the UN as its foundation, would be catastrophic for an increasingly unstable world. The peoples of the world, in one way or another, are increasingly asking the question: “Is anybody in control anymore?” when they see growing disagreement among the great powers, the re-emergence of old inter-state conflicts, terrorists on their streets, chaos in their markets, and jobs disappearing with nothing to replace them. People are questioning whether we are beginning to see the beginning of a deeper crisis in the foundations of the overall post-war order itself.
[Sarcastically derisive editorial comment deleted]
The fatal illusion continues:
If every EU member were prepared to make concessions to the concerns of others, everyone could emerge better off.
Confusing integration with a global optimization process is the single most calamitous error of modern times.
I don't want a future in which politics is primarily a battle between cosmopolitan finance capitalism and ethno-nationalist backlash.
— Christopher Hayes (@chrislhayes) June 24, 2016
This is what the rancorous Brexit controversy — and catabolic geopolitics in general — looks like when the option between integrative connection and disintegrative disconnection is elaborated, without reference to the diagonal line (of connective disintegration).
Zizek is worth referencing on the same conundrum.
The integrationist protection racket:
No matter the outcome of this week’s British referendum on whether to leave the European Union, the damage is already done. The Brexit campaign has given British citizens an eyeful of the globalist agenda, and they have now witnessed the extent to which defenders of that agenda will go to keep Brits in line through fear and threats. […] The “remain” camp’s message hasn’t been that things are going too wonderfully to warrant a change. That would be a tough sell to people who feel that things are pretty lousy right now. Instead, the “pro-Europe” message is that things could potentially get even worse. It’s basic psychology: People tend to be more motivated by the fear of losing what little they have than by the prospect of gaining something they don’t have. Thus, those who have been advocating for Britain to remain in its European straitjacket have treated voters the same way parents treat a child threatening to run away from home. …
If not yet, then eventually, this kind of thing will backfire.
Ragged as hell — but that’s what it is.