Crypto-Current (000)

Ten years to the day since Satoshi Nakamoto released the Bitcoin whitepaper is long enough.

Serialization of Crypto-Current: Bitcoin and Philosophy starts here, and will continue (with some moments of disorder) until the damn thing is all out. Further notes on the order of release will be forthcoming. Chunks will be limited until they’re drowning in footnotes – which means not getting beyond the epigraphs today.

A cryptic Halloween to all.

Contents:

Foreword
Chapter-1: Introduction
Chapter-2: Cryptocurrency as Critique
Chapter-3: Bitcoin and its Doubles
Chapter-4: State of Play
Chapter-5: Cash Machines
Chapter-6: The Open Secret

Appendix-1: The 2008 Bitcoin Paper
Appendix-2: Techonomics and Diagonal Method
Appendix-3: Cryptocurrency and World Order

Bitcoin Time-Line
Coins
Organizations
People
Websites
Glossary
Notes
References
URLs

There is a sort of vast cycle of flows of production and chains of inscription, and a lesser cycle, between the stocks of filiation that connect or encaste the flows, and the blocks of alliance that cause the chains to flow.
– Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari *

Everybody needs money. That’s why they call it ‘money’.
– David Mamet **

“What is truth?”
– Pontius Pilate (John 18:38) ***

I have a lot of friends who are programmers. The programmers have always gone like, “Those [Bitcoin] guys are crazy.” […] And then, almost 100 percent of the time, they sit down, read the paper, read the code – it takes them a couple weeks – and they come out the other side. And they’re like: “Oh my god, this is it. This is the big breakthrough. This is the thing we’ve been waiting for. He solved all the problems. Whoever he is should get the Nobel prize – he’s a genius. This is the thing! This is the distributed trust network that the Internet always needed and never had.”
– Marc Andreessen ****

It would be very surprising if [the Bitcoin solution to the Byzantine Generals’ Problem] didn’t have substantial application. … That something very significant has happened – I think the prospects for that are quite good.
– Larry Summers *****

Bitcoin is hard to grasp because it’s almost like a technology from an alien civilization.
– Ian Bogost ******

In this paper, we propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer distributed timestamp server to generate computational proof of the chronological order of transactions.
– Satoshi Nakamoto *******

Nullius in verba
– Motto of the Royal Society ********

* Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix, Capitalism and Schizophrenia Volume I: Anti-Oedipus.
** Heist (2001), David Mamet.
*** John 18:38
**** Marc Andreessen interviewed by The Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/05/21/marc-andreessen-in-20-years-well-talk-about-bitcoin-like-we-talk-about-the-internet-today/
***** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVGq0zaZsNg&feature=youtu.be
****** https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/05/blockchain-of-command/528543/
******* ‘Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System’ (2008)
https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
******** Nullius in verba is commonly translated as “On nobody’s word” or “Take nobody’s word for it”. It formulates the principle of trustlessness at the origin of modern science. The motto dates back to the founding on the Royal Society, in November 1660. It is extracted from Horace’s Epistle to Maecenas (his benefactor), in which he apologizes for abandoning lyric poetry for philosophy.

7 thoughts on “Crypto-Current (000)

    • I’d quote Josef Stalin if he’d made an interesting comment about Bitcoin (and do later quote Lenin, even though he didn’t).

      • are you sure buddy

        First the productive forces of society change and develop, and then, depending on these changes and in conformity with them, men’s relations of production, their economic relations, change. This, however, does not mean that the relations of production do not influence the development of the productive forces and that the latter are not dependent on the former. While their development is dependent on the development of the productive forces, the relations of production in their turn react upon the development of the productive forces, accelerating or retarding it…

        The productive forces are not only the most mobile and revolutionary element in production, but are also the determining element in the development of production.

  1. Pingback: Nick Land-Bitcoin y Filosofía (000) – Singulier~Universel

  2. Pingback: On Gender Acceleration and Its Critics – Guerrilla Ontology

Leave a Reply