Shanghai's economy, at $414 billion, is larger today than China's entire national economy was in 1990. pic.twitter.com/UavtQD0yVD
— The Spectator Index (@spectatorindex) February 12, 2017
hacked by NG689Skw
[Trashed a couple of innocuous blog posts. Guess it made a point?]
Some realistic questions about prospective machine intelligence regulation:
… we still don’t have a concrete answer about how to effectively regulate the use of algorithms. AI is just another very complex layer added to this already complex discussion, sometimes directly related to “big data” (in the case of deep learning, for example) and other times addressing far bigger questions (in the case of sentient machines, for example).
The UF (accelerationist) response is probably predictable: There isn’t time to reach answers. Acceleration means only (and exactly) that the problem is receding, or escaping. If it would only slow down, everything would be okay. It won’t.
In 2016 the world saw the completion of 128 skyscrapers, up from 114 in 2015, according to the US-based Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (it defines a skyscraper as being higher than 200 m, or 656 ft). Of those, 84 came from China, a new record for the nation. China has topped the council’s completions list every year for nearly a decade (pdf, p. 2). In 2015 it notched 68 such buildings, also a record in China at the time. […] Shenzhen, a city in southern China known for electronics manufacturing, stood out last year, completing 11 such skyscrapers. That’s more than the US and Australia combined.
If there’s such a thing as fundamentalist accelerationism — in a good way — it’s this.
lrt: uh yeah Obama just low key pitched communism to the New Yorker pic.twitter.com/KcxnaDECni
— Melissa 🕯 (@0xabad1dea) November 19, 2016
Good catch. He doesn’t exactly quote the MAP, but he gets comically close.
So the world’s first Left Accelerationist regime was destroyed in a frog-cataclysm. One for the history books.
Hanson (in conversation): “The Age of Em may only last a year or two …”